Fiat uno 2010 review and video
July 6, 2010 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive news, Automotive reviews
Vehicles arriving in Venezuela today I bring you some information about the Fiat Uno 2010, this vehicle in its year’s version has a heated windshield that allows its function and demisting in a span of three minutes defogging the windshield completely, and when complete process automatically disables this feature.
2010 Fiat Uno
These vehicles are priced at each of its models Vivace (1.0), Attractive (1.4), Way (1.0) and Way (1.4) ranging from $ 14,500 to 16,000 U.S. dollars in their versions of 2 and 4 doors.
The engines are:
Evo 1.0 Fire Engine has a maximum output of 73 hp and maximum torque 9.5 kgm at 3,850 rpm. With alcohol, the power is 75 bhp and 9.9 kgm torque arrives at 3,850 rpm. Urban consumption of 15.6 km / l (gasoline) and 10.5 km / l (alcohol) as the route does 20.1 km / l (gasoline) and 12.9 km / l (alcohol).
Fire Engine Evo 1.4 has a maximum output of 85 hp and maximum torque of 12.4 kgm at 3,500 rpm operating only with gasoline. Using alcohol only, its power is 88 hp and torque 12.5 kgm at 3,500 rpm. Urban consumption, 14.7 km / l (gasoline) and 10.3 km / l (alcohol) use in route, 19.4 km / l (gasoline) and 12.8 km / l (alcohol).
Both engines are five-speed manual transmission
In Europe come to be below 500, while the Mercosur replace the current model.
In Europe it would be placed in a level below the Fiat 500.
The new model, known as Project 326 / 327, take the 500 platform, providing a good space for four passengers in a vehicle of only 3.50 meters long and 1.50 high.
In Mercosur, perhaps, could be reached using any platform in the region.
We do not have specific data on the interior finish and equipment.
In Brazil are planning to produce it quickly and eventually present it in November 2009.
This new model could be marketed in Italy and South America, can reach to other emerging markets in eastern Europe and Asia.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
Citroen ds3 review and video
July 6, 2010 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive news, Automotive reviews
Citroën Racing and Sports has set his new career. We talk about the Citroën DS3 R3, a career-client model adapted to the approval of the FIA R3 and most likely replaced in the official team Citroën C4 WRC to fit 1.6 Turbo specifications provided for in the World Rally Championship FIA 2013.
The Citroën DS3 R3 shares many components with the Citroën DS3 street in order to reduce costs and make it an affordable model of competition. The most important difference is in safety, something I could not miss is the roll cage and reinforcements in the body and chassis to avoid any damage to occupants in the event of an accident. Beyond these changes, go with those white wheels and tires BF Goodrich racing, it’s all beautiful.
Under the hood we have a 1.6 THP PSA group, the same limited edition Citroen DS3 Racing. In this case homologous 210 hp and 350 Nm, and no doubt almost everything in this engine is unique to the competition model. I’m talking about pistons, camshafts, connecting rods, electronic control unit, turbo and exhaust system.
Even more important are the changes it suffered in the suspension system to adapt to the competition. It Citroën has applied all the knowledge acquired in the “prototype” Citroën C4 WRC Citroën for this small DS3 R3 is competitive in all types of surfaces. They say they have covered over 10,000 km of testing to ensure the reliability of this product.
For this is the first Citroën vehicle racing-client equipped with Turbo engine, and also the first piloted with sequential shift. The latter is a must in competition, given the time savings involved in introducing the marches directly without the possibility of failure, especially considering that the own electronic control unit that controls the change from a march prevents too short or too high.
Even know its price, but I imagine that Citroën Racing and manage the reserves first pilots who are interested in becoming a DS3 Citroën R3.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
New Jetta 2011 – Volkswagen Jetta review and video
July 6, 2010 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive news, Automotive reviews
Volkswagen has developed in recent months his new Jetta in the warm areas of Death Valley, U.S.. According to our spies tell us, this testing period is over and the sedan is ready to land in our market in the last quarter of the year.
FACTS :
Volkswagen launches diesel version for two of its Jetta models: the truck and four-door sedan. The engine of this model operates on clean diesel (clean diesel) low sulfur and delivering a model environment-friendly, since it generates low noise pollution and fewer toxic emissions to the environment.
The Jetta uses a diesel engine of 2.0 liter four-cylinder that produces 140 horsepower. The transmission power is transferred via standard six-speed manual and likewise have the option of automatic transmission, six-speed DSG. The model reaches a level of consumption that is very attractive at a time when the economy where the price of fuel is a persuader when it comes to selecting a vehicle and who is 29 miles per gallon in the city and 40 on the road open, ie Jetta can provide an average of 38-42 miles per gallon under ideal conditions.
The two Jetta comes with a comprehensive list of optional equipment and the manufacturer intends to enter all markets by offering free maintenance for three years from the initial purchase of the vehicle.
The two models are exactly Jetta petrol models, the only difference being the engine.
As shown in these virtual images, the overall aesthetics of the new Jetta will be based on Conceot Compact Hybrid Coupe we saw in Detroit, except that the ceiling collapsed in the back is not as pronounced as in the model two-door exposure. Surely, both will hit the market before the end of this 2010, but first will come the turn of the sedan – a car with great acceptance in the U.S. market and then the amazing VW Jetta Coupe.
As usual, the Jetta has the same DNA as the latest Golf, which is all an aesthetic revolution for this sedan that now will be far more dynamic and cutting edge than previous versions. The front will be the same as the Golf, in side view will look like tires, mirrors and door trim with the same design and only in the rear are the original side of the Jetta, with a trunk and some pilots very similar to the Audi A4.
In the mechanical section there will be no surprises. Enjoy the same chassis as the Golf VI (see impressions) and share range of engines, at least initially. By the 2012 release a hybrid version will train with seven-speed DSG.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
Compare body automotive – full comparation – Ford F-150 vs. GMC Sierra
December 25, 2008 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive reviews
Coparation between Ford and Sierra
The rivalry between Ford and Chevrolet comes time ago, and the market for light trucks, is perhaps even more intense. So when I had the opportunity to test a GMC Sierra (equivalent to the Chevy Silverado) and a Ford F-150 in the same week, I took to prepare this report comparing the two vans.
So we begin: In a corner of the ring have to GMC Sierra 1500 4WD Double Cab SLT and in the other corner, the Ford F-150 4×4 Double Cab Lariat King Ranch.
The GMC Sierra came equipped with the package “All-Terrain”, which in turn includes the whole “Z71″ with a brand Eaton rear differential with auto workers, 34mm front stabilizer bar and shock absorbers branded “Rancho” stronger and designed Applications for all-terrain.
On the other hand, the Ford F-150 was a “King Ranch”, the most luxurious of all F-150, equipped with a myriad of details such as leather seats that seem lined gloves, a pair of storage boxes mounted A system of rails in the box and a rearview mirror with integrated camera to attend the retreat.
Strength of the train engine
Both trucks are in good physical condition, with muscular V-8 engines and large displacement. The GMC version has Motor VORTEC of 5.3 liters with aluminum block and cylinder deactivation system to reduce gasoline consumption and to get figures of 14/19mpg. The engine is coupled to a four-speed automatic box and generates 315hp and 338 lb-ft of torque.
Ford did not go far enough with the Triton V-8, 5.4L 3-valve that develops 300hp and 365 lb-ft of torque and consumption figures 13/17mpg. The engine has the designation FFV (Flexible Fuel Vehicle) because it accepts fuel mixture E85 (85% ethanol and 15% gasoline). Here, too, the engine is coupled to a four-speed automatic transmission.
Thanks to these super-powerful machines, like boxers that receive large loads during his sporting life, these vans resist loads up to 7000 pounds for the GMC and Ford in 7200 pounds.
Flexible Load
These vans are made to bear the burden and if it comes, the Ford is on the front with a box 78.8 inches long and 65.5 cubic feet of volume. The Ford came equipped with an optional load (new for 2008) that includes cross bars ($ 190) that are mounted on slides and slide along the box. The system guides also allows optional storage boxes on both sides ($ 295) and a movable divider optional ($ 150).
The GMC Sierra with double cabin is available only with a box of 69.3 inches shorter in length and 53.2 cubic feet. The box of the test model came with a hard plastic protector.
Feet on the pavement
The technique and control in the movements is essential in both boxing and trucks exhibited excellent handling characteristics, however the advantage is the GMC for his impeccable maneuverability. Despite his suspension firmer, ironically the Sierra has a ride as soft and perhaps even more comfortable than the F-150, which feels more truck, heavier and more likely to transmit the vibrations from the pavement to the cockpit. The F-150 is defended in his skill and performance, although their movements are less precise and more forced.
Both accelerates with authority and aplomb, but Sierra has a weight advantage to take the box shorter, and feels leaner and more agile. From the subjective point of view, the roar emanated by the engine of the Ford is more sound and rewarding to the ear.
The Ford F-150 did not have a traction control system (optional), which did not help to speed up the wet. The F-150 also did not have a position “AUTO” in the system of four-wheel-drive. Here is the Sierra had the advantage of having these two features.
The engine of the Sierra also has great appeal, but not the type sound, and has a deactivation system that allows you to operate in the form of four-cylinder, helping to save fuel. The system is completely transparent and not cause delays in responding to the commands of the driver.
Balance and harmony in the cabin
The biggest difference between the vans is the feeling when entering the cabin to simulate his walking. The GMC has a character that was more akin to that of a conventional car, with a smooth and horizontal board, while the Ford is more rustic design more straight and vertical, one might say more traditional in this regard.
Both trucks are finished with first class materials. For example, to the upholstery of the F-150, Ford uses the softest leather that has passed through my hands. In the Sierra, GMC uses a combination of gray leather and dark reddish brown, giving the cabin an air of sophistication rarely seen in this segment.
Both schemes have to go back. While the GMC has sensors in the rear bumper and a small display in the right rear pillar that change from yellow to red when approaching an obstacle, Ford goes further and offers as an option ($ 450) a rearview mirror that incorporates a screen that lights up and displays an image back to back.
Navigation systems, intuitive and easy to use, are available in both. The GMC has a system to a CD, while the Ford has a changer for six CDs. The systems show the position of the vehicle and give verbal commands and visual cues to guide you to your destination. The color screens and touch to control the functions of the sound system that includes AM / FM radio and satellite, CD and a port for connecting an iPod.
Ford includes an optional sliding rear window that allows the entry of fresh air and access to the box. The GMC offered as an option. The rear seat bench of both type vans is divided 60/40 and reclining is to use the floor as the cargo area.
Here the decision is based on the tastes and preferences of each person. The GMC has a more refined air and Ford with a more traditional and familiar.
Results from combat
The Ford F-150 and Chevrolet Silverado (equivalent to the GMC Sierra) share the podium in sales, occupying the first and second place respectively. Here there are no boxers fallen, the two vans are a “knock out”, extremely capable and competitive in the market. After a hard-fought struggle, the result is very uneven, but the advantage was maintained by the GMC Sierra.
GMC has raised the level of the game with this new version of the Sierra. Although the trophy GMC takes it this time, the verdict may change with the next generation of the F-150 that will debut in the third quarter of the year when we will have the opportunity to assess whether the domain and GMC maintains advantage over the popular Ford.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
Top 10 Best Pickup Truck List – best world automotive truck
December 25, 2008 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive reviews
This is Top 10 Best Pickup Truck List – best world automotive truck :
 |
1. 2008 GMC Sierra 1500 MSRP From: $17,500 |
 |
6. 2008 Dodge Dakota MSRP From: $19,435 |
 |
2. 2008 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 MSRP From: $17,500 |
 |
7. 2008 Ford Ranger MSRP From: $14,220 |
 |
3. 2008 Ford F-150 MSRP From: $17,520 |
 |
8. 2008 Toyota Tacoma MSRP From: $14,280 Visit Research Center |
 |
4. 2008 Dodge Ram 1500 MSRP From: $21,215 Visit Research Center |
 |
9. 2008 Nissan Titan MSRP From: $24,390 |
 |
5. 2008 Toyota Tundra MSRP From: $22,290 |
 |
10. 2008 Nissan Frontier MSRP From: $16,250 |
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
Mercedes-Benz SL renewed – automotive review
August 30, 2008 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive reviews
Mercedes-Benz SL renewed, with changes in appearance from the outside, engines and equipment. The new range of this sport is for sale from 92,300 euros’ SL 280 “and it costs up to 248,000 euros’ AMG ‘most potente.El SL is a two-seater convertible with a retractable hardtop. Regarding the previous model, there are changes in appearance from the outside: have been redesigned headlamps, pilots, bumpers, grille and exterior mirrors (which now includes intermittent side).
Versions’ AMG ‘are the most sporting of the SL range. Are distinguished because they have changes in the bodywork, suspension and brakes.
The exterior appearance is also different. They differ by a black grille, front bumper with air intakes and larger openings for the evacuation of heat from the radiator oil, a rear diffuser, rear wing and some lights obscured. In addition, the fog are circular and oval instead of the bonnet is domed.
There are six versions of FS, each with a different engine: ‘SL 280 “(3.0 l V6 231 hp),” SL 350 “(3.5 l V6 316 hp),” SL 500′ (5 , 5 l V8 388 hp), “SL 600″ (5.5 l V12-517 hp), “SL 63 AMG” (6.2 l V8 525 hp) and ‘SL 65 AMG “(6.0 l V12, 612 hp).
All engines are atmospheric and are linked to a seven-speed automatic change, except that the V12 turbo and are associated with one of five speeds.
The most important innovation is the new variant “63 AMG”, which replaces the previous “55 AMG”. The difference between these versions is in the engine (6.2 l aspirated V8 compared to 5.4 l turbocharged V8 ’55 AMG “). The power, performance and consumption virtually unchanged.
In addition, there is a new variant of access (280) and a 44 hp more powerful engine for the “350″. In general, all versions consume slightly less than before.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
Audi A4 Avant is on sale – automotive review
August 30, 2008 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive reviews
The new Audi A4 Avant is on sale from 32,820 euros, about 1,700 euros more than the saloon. For the moment, can only be purchased with two gasoline engines and two diesel.
The family version of the A4 measured the same as the four-door (4.70 m), while its trunk is only 10 litres more (490 versus 480 l l). The trunk of the Avant is more practical because you have gate-to-mouth and a larger-entry is more convenient to load. The large interior space, equipment and plenty of good qualities dynamics do not change.
At the time of launch, is available with two petrol engines (1.8 l T FSI 160 hp and 3.2 l V6 FSI of 265 hp) and two Diesel (2.0 l TDI 143 hp and 3 , 0 l V6 TDI 239 hp). All have direct fuel injection and, except for the 3.2 l FSI, everyone is turbo. The A4 Avant with six-cylinder engines have traction total.
All engines are associated with a shift six-speed manual. Optionally, the two least powerful (143 and 160 hp) can join an automatic gearbox ‘multitronic’ eight speeds. The V6 petrol is also available with an automatic change ‘Tiptronic’ six speeds.
After the summer, may be bought with five other engines, two petrol (2.0 TFSI l variants in the 180 and 211 hp) and three diesel (2.0 l TDI 120-hp, 2.0 l TDI 170 CV and 2.7 l TDI 190 hp).
As far as we have seen in the A4 four-door, gives the impression of being a big car and quality. Although not as comfortable as a Mercedes-Benz C-Class or as nimble as a BMW 3 Series, the A4 has an intermediate point between comfort and agility very accomplished. Moreover, it is well insulated from the noise of the engine.
With the diesel engine of 143 hp, is fast and its consumption is low. Regarding the previous 140 hp engine (which had a direct injection pump-injector rather than through common), is markedly softer and less noisy.
Related car reviews and automotive news articles :
KIA d 1.6 CRDi – automotive review
August 30, 2008 by Automotive
Filed under Automotive reviews
El KIA pro_cee´d es la versión de tres puertas del cee´d. Puede comprarse desde 13.281 hasta 19.356 euros, con dos motores de gasolina y tres Diesel.
Es entre 650 y 800 euros más costoso que la variante con carrocería de cinco puertas. Como el cee´d, el pro_cee´d es uno de los modelos más recomendables de los de características similares que se venden en España.
Tiene muchas virtudes que lo hacen muy recomendable. Destaca por tener una relación entre precio y equipamiento mejor que la media. Su espacio interior y su calidad de acabado también son mejores de lo normal.
En cualidades dinámicas y en estabilidad se encuentra a la altura de los mejores, como un Ford Focus, un Volkswagen Golf y, en menor medida, un SEAT León.
Además tiene una garantía mecánica de hasta siete años ó 150.000 km (los tres primeros años sin límite de km).
El pro_cee´d mide 4,25 m de largo, 1 cm más que la versión de cinco puertas. Sus dimensiones exteriores son parecidas a las de un Opel Astra (4,25 m) y un Peugeot 308 (4,28 m). El maletero mide 340 l; es un tamaño normal para un coche de estas dimensiones.
Está disponible con dos motores de gasolina y tres Diesel. Los de gasolina son un 1,6 l de 122 CV y un 2,0 l de 143 CV. Los motores Diesel son 1,6 l CRDi en dos variantes de potencia (90 y 115 CV) y un 2,0 l CRDi de 140 CV.
Todos los motores van unidos a un cambio manual de cinco velocidades, salvo el Diesel de 140 CV que va asociado a uno de seis velocidades.
Con todos los motores destaca por tener unas prestaciones normales (con una velocidad máxima algo baja para su potencia) y un consumo contenido en las versiones de gasolina y bajo en las Diesel.
La versión Diesel de 115 CV, que es la que hemos probado, da un resultado muy bueno por suavidad, silencio, prestaciones y consumo.
